Swenson Constituting Opposition: Antonio Negri and the Concept of Real Subsumption. Antonio Negri argues in several places (Twenty Thesis on Marx, Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse, Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State, and The Savage Anomaly) that the current mode of production of advanced capital can be understood in Marxian terms as a system that has achieved the point of real subsumption. Or, that the capitalist mode of production has achieved a level of development whereby it has subsumed not only the traditional bourgeois capitalist mode of production, but also any socialist model, and most insidiously even the smallest fraction of any individuals social production. This argument essentially claims that there has been a transformation in the relation between work time the time of ones direct involvement in creating surplus value and exploitation. The mode of real subsumption is capable of extracting from any production even and especially production different from traditional forms of work surplus value for capital. Negri argues that this is the result of the transformation in the mode of production from a system of production to a system based on circulation, where every moment of communication is transformed either directly or indirectly into surplus value. Capital has advanced to a point where to be alive is to be at work. In this paper I will give a brief analysis of Negris argument concerning real subsumption, along with the relevant passages in Marxs Grundrisse on which Negri bases his argument, in order to argue that rather than being a hopeless situation for the struggle for liberation, it is, in fact, only within a system of real subsumption that there is the potential for a truly radical politics. This is a complex argument, and one that forces us to ask many questions about the form that liberatory activity in our time would need to take in order to successfully combat the forces of capitalism. In my paper I hope to pose these questions in such a way as to provoke discussion and analysis of Negris work, as well as raise relevant questions as to the role of theory and the intellectual in this struggle. I am currently a Ph.D. candidate in Comparative Studies in Discourse and Society at the University of Minnesota. If accepted, I look forward to meeting other graduate students interested in Marxist theory and questions of liberation. I can be reached at: Brynnar Swenson swen0171@tc.umn.edu 3052 11th Ave. S #8 Minneapolis, MN 55407 (612) 724-1832